A Midsummer Night's Dream

by William Shakespeare

Dr. Barbara A. Mowat (Editor) and Paul Werstine (Editor)

John Dover Wilson's New Shakespeare, published between 1921 and 1966, became the classic Cambridge edition of Shakespeare's plays and poems until the 1980s. The series, long since out-of-print, is now reissued. Each work is available both individually and as a set, and each contains a lengthy and lively introduction, main text, and substantial notes and glossary printed at the back. The edition, which began with The Tempest and ended with The Sonnets, put into practice the techniques and theories that had evolved under the 'New Bibliography'. Remarkably by today's standards, although it took the best part of half a century to produce, the New Shakespeare involved only a small band of editors besides Dover Wilson himself. As the volumes took shape, many of Dover Wilson's textual methods acquired general acceptance and became an established part of later editorial practice, for example in the Arden and New Cambridge Shakespeares.

• ISBN10: 0743477545
• ISBN13: 9780743477543
• Publish Date: 1 January 2004 (first published 26 February 1900)
• Publish Status: Active
• Out of Print: 14 September 2015
• Publish Country: US
• Publisher: Simon & Schuster
• Imprint: Washington Square Press Inc.,N.Y.
• Format: Paperback (US Mass Market)
• Pages: 256
• Language: English

Reviews

[leahrosereads]

I listened to this on audio and read along. With the full cast and the words in front of me, it really helped bring this story to life. I thoroughly enjoyed it and plan on going this route with William Shakespeare's other work in the future.

[clq]

I've been meaning to catch up on various Shakespeare plays that "everyone" has read, and after finishing a book and having no immediate plans for what to read next, A Midsummer Night's Dream was conveniently waiting for me on my Kindle.
In short, I didn't really like reading it much. I can see how it would probably work much better on stage, but read as a book it didn't really do much for me.
If I ever get the opportunity to see it on stage I probably will, and I'll be prepared to be pleasantly surprised at how well it can work as a play.
That said, I do enjoy poems, and I found the lyrical nature of the dialogue, the rhythm and the rhyme, to be quite fun. But as a story I just didn't really appreciate it as much as I had expected.

I started the novel off with a major headache, as I tried to analyse and understand each sentence carefully, which was a complete mistake. After my headache went away, I decided to give this book another try, using a different approach. I stopped analysing and I started reading. At first understanding the play was difficult, but when I got to the end, I had to admit that Shakespeare was a genius!

Hermia is in love with Lysander, but Hermia's father wants her to marry Demetrius. Helena loves Demetrius, but unfortunately, he loves Hermia. The situation is extremely complex, but at the same time, the couples are melodramatic and this creates a whole load of comedy. This comedic situation, coupled with uneducated workmen putting on a play, the king or queen of the faries arguing over an Indian boy and a love-juice that makes a person fall in love with the first thing they see, creates plenty of problems and one solution.

A Midsummer Night's Dream was written in the 16th century, but it is still relatable to people living in the 20th century. This play is clever, funny and Puck totally stole the show.

[clementine]

Oh, another one I forgot to review. Once again, I am not really into writing a whole lot about this one, but I liked it more than I expected to. I read it in grade 9 (first Shakespeare play, holla) and wasn't all that impressed, and generally I like the tragedies a lot better than the comedies. But the second time around, I did really enjoy it. There's a lot going on, and it's much darker than it seems on the surface. And when you have the Shakespearean context it's that much more enjoyable. I also really enjoyed the fantastical world, because, come on, fairies. Why not?