kiracanread
Written on Apr 3, 2020
Robert Louis Stevenson originally wrote Dr. Jekyll And Mr Hyde as a "chilling shocker." He then burned the draft and, upon his wife's advice, rewrote it as the darkly complex tale it is today. Stark, skillfully woven, this fascinating novel explores the curious turnings of human character through the strange case of Dr. Jekyll, a kindly scientist who by night takes on his stunted evil self, Mr. Hyde. Anticipating modern psychology, Jekyll And Hyde is a brilliantly original study of man's dual nature—as well as an immortal tale of suspense and terror. Published in 1866, Jekyll And Hyde was an instant success and brought Stevenson his first taste of fame. Though sometimes dismissed as a mere mystery story, the book has evoked much literary admirations. Vladimir Nabokov likened it to Madame Bovary and Dead Souls as "a fable that lies nearer to poetry than to ordinary prose fiction."
- ISBN10 055321277X
- ISBN13 9780553212778
- Publish Date 1 March 1982 (first published 31 December 1963)
- Publish Status Active
- Out of Print 17 June 2015
- Publish Country US
- Publisher Random House USA Inc
- Imprint Bantam Books Inc
- Format Paperback (US Mass Market)
- Pages 112
- Language English
- URL https://penguinrandomhouse.com/books/isbn/9780553212778
Reviews
moraa
Written on Mar 18, 2020
3.5 stars
Read this so I could finally understand the meaning of the metaphor. Sometimes Google just isn't enough.
maggiefan
Written on Sep 24, 2019
Let's begin with the positives:
- a really spooky atmosphere
- Jekyll's kinda cool :)) a very interesting character with a backstory
- Hyde's kinda cool too
- this quote - '“If he be Mr. Hyde,” he had thought, “I shall be Mr. Seek.”'
The negatives:
- I didn't get enough of Jekyll and Hyde. Instead I got more than enough of Mr. Utterson. He's just so bland and boring, I don't know...
- VEEEERYYY slow pacing, especially in the beginning. Nothing happens until the end. And considering it's a very short book it's weird and not okay for me.
- I guessed the plot twist from the beginning. It's not like it's a bad thing. It just took away from the story a little bit. And I think that the author could have tried to make it less obvious.
leahrosereads
Written on Oct 21, 2018
But just barely.
I don't recommend this, and honestly, if you want a condensed or different version than the original - watch a movie. You'll get more out of it.
The art is incredible though.
nightingalereads
Written on Sep 28, 2017
Well-executed, and an interesting enough premise, but I don't think this one will stay with me. The story's twist has lost all its shock factor in my eyes, and I found the ending to be rather anticlimactic and overly expository.
boghunden
Written on May 31, 2016
It was a very quick read, but unfortunately the story never really captivated me the way I expected it to. I think that's due to the plot twist (meaning that I knew the story already and therefor I didn't get too excited about the twist with the Jekyll and Hyde-thing. I didn't know about the details though, and I really liked those parts. One of the things I liked in particular, were the letters.
The writing style was pretty good, it didn't feel like an old novel at any point, which I really enjoyed. I also found it to be funny at some parts, like "play Hyde and seek", and the way it described the "evil woman face".
I listened to the audiobook of this and although I enjoyed the narrator, it wasn't really loud enough for me to be able to hear it all clearly when I was out walking. :/
celinenyx
Written on Jul 17, 2013
Usually his story is turned into a science-fiction action-packed romp, while the original is much more subtle. It's more mystery than science-fiction. We follow the lawyer Mr Utterson, who is a bit concerned about his friend Dr Jekyll, when Dr Jekyll creates a new will, leaving everything he owns to a the infamous Mr Hyde in case of his disappearance. Mr Utterson doesn't trust this, and suspects his friend is being threatened or black-mailed.
Well, we all already know what's really going on. I think it's a shame I was spoiled with the twist at the end. It takes away much of the mystery if you are in the know. The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde is still a very enjoyable novella though. It's well written, and the last chapter alone warrants a reread in a year or so.
I love how books written during the last part of the nineteenth and the start of the twentieth century have themes that you don't find in contemporary literature any more. They still believe in a real good, in technology as solution, but also focus on the soul of man, on our constitution as humans. This descriptive and contemplative nature of writing is pretty much lost after the Second World War, when the belief in mankind is destroyed by the atrocities committed during that time. Literature is much more bleak and post-modern now, which isn't much to my taste.
There is a lot more to The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde than the adaptations let on, and I'd certainly recommend it to lovers of soft science-fiction mixed with some interesting non-preachy philosophic bits.
Michael @ Knowledge Lost
Written on May 16, 2013
This is a reread for me so like I did in The Great Gatsby; I’m going to quote my old review (which is relatively short) but expand with what I know now. First we need some context; Robert Louis Stevenson had already had some success as a Victorian adventure writer before he came up with the idea of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. He had already written Treasure Island and his collection of short stories New Arabian Nights; in fact it is believe that he came up with the idea while working on his revisions for the short story Markheim (which, in my opinion, is his best piece). So already you get a sense that he knows what he is doing and if you’ve read Markheim you can see the similarities clearly. It was the late into the Nineteenth Century where there were extraordinary technological advances being made and people had a growing pessimism towards a possible decline in arts and religion.
The Promethean personality is something we’ve seen in books like Dracula by Bram Stoker, but this novella has more in common with Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Both involve scientists that defy the laws of nature and God with major consequences. Also, they play on the concept of good and evil and the dangers of advancing sciences but they also have been written in a way that to this day people debate the meaning of the novel.
Some say this is a novella that looks at that great Victorian idea of inner conflict with humanity; that good and evil exist in us all and it is an internal struggle between the two. While others suggest that maybe Stevenson was interested in exploring mental health, especially when it comes to split personalities or what should be correctly called a dissociative identity disorder? When I first read this book I got a sense of both, saying “[That] it’s a vivid portrayal of a split personality, split in the sense that within the same person there is both an apparently good and an evil personality each being quite distinct from the other.” As an interesting side note Vladimir Nabokov has famously argued that the “good versus evil” view within this novella is misleading, as Dr Jekyll himself is not, by Victorian standards, a morally good person.
“The novella’s impact is such that it has become a part of the language, with the phrase “Jekyll and Hyde” coming to mean a person who is vastly different in moral character from one situation to the next.” While this is true, the tale has left a bigger impact on pop culture than just one phrase and classic horror movies. Within comic books both The Hulk and Batman’s rival Two-Face have clear influences from this novella; in fact you might argue that all superheroes are influenced as well, all living a double life. Even the framework has been used in other fables, gothic, horror and speculative fiction.
“Robert Louis Stevenson is an amazing writer and this book is well worth the read, I’ve always enjoyed a story that tries to explore two sides of a situation.” Not only does this highlight how much I’ve improved in my reviewing but it serves as a reminder of my interest in plots that explore both points of view. Frankenstein still remains my ‘go to book’ for this even though rereading Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde has rekindled an interest in Robert Louis Stevenson’s thoughts on the whole “good versus evil” view. I much prefer Markheim and think I might go read it again now.
This review originally appeared on my blog; http://literary-exploration.com/2013/05/30/book-of-the-month-the-strange-case-of-dr-jekyll-and-mr-hyde/
adastra
Written on Dec 23, 2012
funstm
Written on Jan 1, 2011