The Phantom Tree

by Nicola Cornick

‘There is much to enjoy in a sumptuous novel that slips between present day and 1557.’ Sunday Mirror

“My name is Mary Seymour and I am the daughter of one queen and the niece of another.”

Browsing antiques shops in Wiltshire, Alison Bannister stumbles across a delicate old portrait – supposedly of Anne Boleyn. Except Alison knows better… The woman is Mary Seymour, the daughter of Katherine Parr who was taken to Wolf Hall in 1557 as an unwanted orphan and presumed dead after going missing as a child.

The painting is more than just a beautiful object from Alison’s past – it holds the key to her future, unlocking the mystery surrounding Mary’s disappearance, and the enigma of Alison’s son.

But Alison’s quest soon takes a dark and foreboding turn, as a meeting place called the Phantom Tree harbours secrets in its shadows…

*************************************************************

Readers love Nicola Cornick:

‘Alluring and hypnotising… I was hooked from page one.’

‘A haunting and mesmerising story.’

‘Atmospheric and filled with tension and danger.’

‘Full of dark twists and spooky turns. Brilliantly written, unguessable and page-turning.’

‘Spellbinding, with a narrative that left me bewitched. Not to be missed!’

‘A fabulous read. I was completely enthralled, and kept guessing throughout.’

• ISBN13: 9781848455047
• Publish Date: 29 December 2016 (first published 1 December 2016)
• Publish Status: Active
• Publish Country: GB
• Publisher: HarperCollins Publishers
• Imprint: HQ
• Format: Paperback
• Pages: 448
• Language: English
• URL: http://harpercollins.co.uk

Reviews

[annieb123]

Originally published on my blog: Nonstop Reader.

The Phantom Tree is a beautifully written time-slip historical novel by Nicola Cornick. Published 21st Aug 2018 by Harlequin on the Graydon House imprint, it's 384 pages and available in paperback, audiobook, and ebook formats.

This book is genre crossing. There are elements of romance, mystery, and historical fiction written around a framework of actual historical characters and events. The characterizations are well done and the dialogue flows pretty well.

There is a strong element of magic (in the context of the time travel). The parallel timelines blend well and the plotting is clear and concise enough that the reader has no trouble following along. I admire the author's ability to blend two entirely disparate times, cultures, languages, etc, into one cohesive whole.

There is no strong language whatever. There is implied sexual content (consensual), but nothing graphic. I found the ending somewhat contrived, but again, the writing is exquisite and it is primarily a historical romance.

Enjoyable, entertaining, and well written. I would recommend it to fans of Diana Gabaldon or Barbara Erskine who are looking to branch out.

Four stars.

Disclosure: I received an ARC at no cost from the author/publisher for review purposes.

[Amber (The Literary Phoenix)]

The Phantom Tree is a story of two girls separated by time, their relationships, and the search that holds them together across centuries.  It's a romance, it's a time travel story, and it's historical fiction.  I was not quite what I expected.

I went into The Phantom Tree expecting something more akin to Philippa Gregory's writing - a court of Tudor intrigue, incredible characters and a respectable amount of villainy.  While there is nothing particularly wrong with The Phantom Tree, it is first and foremost a romance.

As far as romances go, it was interesting enough.  Predictable, of course.  We have Alison's love story in the present that announces itself early on, where Mary's story starts when she is a child and we aren't introduced into to her love until the last part of the book.  That romance is fast and fierce.  I think people who enjoy romance stories, and historical romance especially, will enjoy The Phantom Tree.  We have rediscovered love, fated love, horrible twisted love... good decisions and bad decisions and everything driven by passions.

I hate some issues with the continuity of Alison's character - I had a difficult time putting together the Alison of the 1500s with the Alison of the 2000s.  They felt like entirely different characters to me.  Additionally, the story line about searching for Alison's son seemed to lose steam somewhere in the middle.  Even though the characters follow through on the storyline, their heart really isn't in it.  That isn't to say there isn't a story - it really is all about the romance - but the advertised storyline is not the one we follow.

The Phantom Tree will appeal to romance lovers, people who love a light historical mystery. The time travel aspect is light and weak, so don't jump in looking for any heavy science-fiction or history.  It was quite good for what it was, though.

[chymerra]

Review coming 8-21-18

[pamela]

Nicola Cornick’s The Phantom Tree, while not perfect, was a pleasant surprise. It was an easy read with some fantastic elements of historical fiction that were believable and genuine. It had similarities to A. S. Byatt’s Possession but lacked its literary focus and genuine depth, yet despite this it was an enjoyable read, if not entirely convincing in its narrative.

The Phantom Tree tells the concurrent stories of two friends, separated by time. Allison Bannister is a woman living in the present, ripped from her family and stranded in a time that isn’t hers. Mary Seymour is a woman lost from history who holds a secret she needs to communicate through time itself.

Tudor historical fiction is a dime a dozen these days. It’s always been popular, so the fact that Nicola Cornick tried to do something different with the formula is commendable. Her descriptions of the period are emotive and beautiful and gave a deep sense of what life would have been like for the ‘forgotten’ aristocracy of the Tudor period. It was less about the large political machinations and big personalities that punctuate what we know about the time, and instead put these elements in the background of a much more personal story. They gave a sense of time and place, rather than becoming the focus of what is, essentially, a very personal story.

It’s a shame then that the modern-day narrative didn’t have the same heart or depth as the historical narrative. Cornick’s love is obviously history, and that love showed through every word where the Tudor period was concerned. The modern elements simply felt flat and lifeless in comparison. We are introduced to Allison when she is already well established in our time. She has a job, an apartment, has already had a serious relationship (which is rekindled with absolutely no spark or romance) and so we never get to know the difficulty she must have had adjusting to modern life having just come from a time that is so far removed from our own as to be a different planet. Despite Allison being the protagonist, it was Mary who had all the characterisation and soul.

I think one of the reasons this may have been the case is that there is no internal logic or believability to the central premise of magic and time travel. At no point is it explained why it is possible. All the characters simply shrug and seem to say ‘that’s just the way it is’. There wasn’t enough in it that could suspend my disbelief at the fantasy elements. If it had been as simply as ‘time travel exists’ I probably could have been ok with that, but there are so many other elements jammed in there that didn’t heighten the narrative at all, that it did bear some kind of explanation. There are visions, precognition, telepathy and a weird telepathic romance that left me a little confused as to why it was necessary.

The ultimate resolution to The Phantom Tree was far too neat. All Allison’s modern day compatriots simply accept her story of time travelling without even a blink of disbelief. In only ten years we are meant to simply accept that she perfectly came to grips with modern life, learns to drive, studies abroad with a university despite having no documentation to even prove that she exists and lands a dream job with a start-up travel company that people would probably kill for, despite there being countries on the itinerary that hadn’t even been discovered at the time she was born. Even the answer to the plot’s great mystery somehow just seems to appear in her mind, despite the plot being set up as a tale of sleuthing through time.

There was a lot to commend The Phantom Tree as a work of historical fiction. But the fantasy elements and blind acceptance of the fantastical situations by the books characters were a little hard to swallow. Where the historical elements flowed naturally and worked as a believable narrative, the modern-day and fantasy elements felt somehow forced and made the book in to something that I don’t think it should ever have been.


Review also at I Blame Wizards