The Daughter of Time

by Josephine Tey

While in hospital, Inspector Grant s professional curiosity is soon aroused. In a portrait of Richard III, the hunchbacked monster of nursery stories and history books, he finds a face that refuses to fit its reputation. But how, after four hundred years, can a bedridden policeman uncover the truth about the murder of the Princes in the Tower?

"From the Paperback edition.""

• ISBN10: 0684803860
• ISBN13: 9780684803869
• Publish Date: 20 November 1995 (first published December 1959)
• Publish Status: Active
• Publish Country: GB
• Publisher: Prentice Hall (a Pearson Education company)
• Imprint: Prentice Hall & IBD
• Format: Paperback
• Pages: 208
• Language: English

Reviews

[brokentune]

Richard III had been credited with the elimination of two nephews, and his name was a synonym for evil. But Henry VII, whose ‘settled and considered policy’ was to eliminate a whole family was regarded as a shrewd and far-seeing monarch. Not very lovable perhaps, but constructive and painstaking, and very successful withal. Grant gave up. History was something that he would never understand. The values of historians differed so radically from any values with which he was acquainted that he could never hope to meet them on any common ground.
I loved this book - it had absolutely everything that I wanted/needed on the rainy winter weekend when I read this.

In a way, I could relate quite well to Inspector Grant as he was laid up in hospital with nothing to do but stare at the ceiling, bored out of his head. Rainy winter weekends can have a similar effect. Unlike Grant, of course, it didn't occur to me to start a research project into the life and legacy of Richard III, I merely cozied up with Tey's book and a good supply of tea and snacks.

I can't even put my finger of why I thought the book was so enjoyable - part of me liked the characters and the banter, part of me liked the "mystery" element, even tho there is little mystery to it, and part liked the historical aspect of it. I loved how Tey chose to format the story, how she disguised her research into the story of RIII as a hobby to pass time with.

In a way, this is why I love historical fiction, not because it sugar-coats all of the historical information and presents it in an easily digestible narrative, but because it dares to ask questions and share how the actual research of non-fictional topics can be fun. It has the power to inspire people to learn more.

I for one will take a much closer look at portraits from now on, and especially the one of RIII.

[MurderByDeath]

I don't know what to say about this book.  I hate talking about books like this because I can't treat it as purely fiction, nor purely non-fiction.  It was well written; it was riveting, even when I was wondering why the hell I was still reading a book about a man flat on his back in a hospital bed.  I kept trying to drag MT into it so he could share my bemusement (he wouldn't be dragged).   At the end I'm left with two lingering questions:   Where the hell does the title of this book come into play?   Why, if this book uses factual evidence, do so many academic sources still claim Richard III killed the princes?   I enjoyed this, but I think someone with a stronger interest in the history of the British monarchy would eat this up and appreciate far more than I did.  And I'll definitely be checking out Tey's more traditional mysteries.

[nightingalereads]

3.5 stars