RoXXie
Written on May 14, 2011
Sicher, es ist schwer zu lesen, aufgrund der "alten" Sprach- und Schreibweise. Doch den Kampf kann man gewinnen. :)
From the international bestselling author of Dracul comes the authoritative sequel to Bram Stoker’s original horror classic.
London, 1912. A quarter of a century after Count Dracula “crumbled into dust,” Quincey Harker—the son of Jonathan and Mina Harker—leaves law school to pursue a career on stage, only to stumble upon the troubled production of Dracula, directed and produced by Bram Stoker himself.
As the play plunges Quincey into the world of his parents' terrible secrets, death begins to stalk the original band of heroes that defeated Dracula a quarter-century ago. Could it be that the count survived...Read more
From the international bestselling author of Dracul comes the authoritative sequel to Bram Stoker’s original horror classic.
London, 1912. A quarter of a century after Count Dracula “crumbled into dust,” Quincey Harker—the son of Jonathan and Mina Harker—leaves law school to pursue a career on stage, only to stumble upon the troubled production of Dracula, directed and produced by Bram Stoker himself.
As the play plunges Quincey into the world of his parents' terrible secrets, death begins to stalk the original band of heroes that defeated Dracula a quarter-century ago. Could it be that the count survived and is now seeking revenge? Or is there another, far more sinister force at work whose relentless purpose is to destroy anything and anyone associated with Dracula, the most notorious vampire of all time...
Dracula the Un-Dead is the true sequel to Bram Stoker’s classic novel, written by his direct descendant and a well-known Dracula historian. Dracula the Un-Dead provides answers to all the questions that the original novel left unexplained, as well as new insights into the world of iniquity and fear lurking just beneath the surface of polite Victorian England.
London, 1912. A quarter of a century after Count Dracula “crumbled into dust,” Quincey Harker—the son of Jonathan and Mina Harker—leaves law school to pursue a career on stage, only to stumble upon the troubled production of Dracula, directed and produced by Bram Stoker himself.
As the play plunges Quincey into the world of his parents' terrible secrets, death begins to stalk the original band of heroes that defeated Dracula a quarter-century ago. Could it be that the count survived and is now seeking revenge? Or is there another, far more sinister force at work whose relentless purpose is to destroy anything and anyone associated with Dracula, the most notorious vampire of all time...
Dracula the Un-Dead is the true sequel to Bram Stoker’s classic novel, written by his direct descendant and a well-known Dracula historian. Dracula the Un-Dead provides answers to all the questions that the original novel left unexplained, as well as new insights into the world of iniquity and fear lurking just beneath the surface of polite Victorian England.
- ISBN10 0451230515
- ISBN13 9780451230515
- Publish Date 5 October 2010 (first published 13 October 2009)
- Publish Status Inactive
- Out of Print 22 January 2025
- Publish Country US
- Publisher Penguin Putnam Inc
- Imprint Berkley Publishing Corporation,U.S.
- Format Paperback (US Trade)
- Pages 432
- Language English
- URL https://penguinrandomhouse.com/books/isbn/9780451230515
9781101148716
eBook
9781440762871
Audiobook
9780525951292
Hardcover
9781410420787
Hardcover
9781408460740
Hardcover
You might also like...
Reviews
Sicher, es ist schwer zu lesen, aufgrund der "alten" Sprach- und Schreibweise. Doch den Kampf kann man gewinnen. :)
Terri M. LeBlanc
Written on Jan 26, 2010
I picked up this book on a whim because I was stuck in an airport nearly done with the novel I had brought with me and the thought of a sequel to Dracula, which I read in college, was intriguing.
After about 10 or 15 chapters I was so confused about what happened in the original novel, that I actually dug out my copy of Dracula and re-read it before continuing with Dracula The Un-Dead. Perhaps that was a mistake because after finishing B. Stoker's original novel and picking up the sequel brought to light all the plots points and characters that were changed from the original novel. I found it amazing that the entire plot line of the original novel was shifted to get D. Stoker/Holt's plot to fit within the timeframe of the Ripper murders and the launching of a famous ship. I was also floored by one revelation at the end of the novel, which I don't think is even possible whether you believe vampires could exist or not. It also made me flashback to Stephanie Meyer's last Twilight novel, Breaking Dawn.
I've read other novels that alter or make you look at classic fiction in a new light that I have really enjoyed. This was not the case with Dracula the Un-Dead. My advice, stick with the original and if you want modern vampire fiction, check out Anne Rice, Charlaine Harris or Elisabeth Kostova's The Historian.
After about 10 or 15 chapters I was so confused about what happened in the original novel, that I actually dug out my copy of Dracula and re-read it before continuing with Dracula The Un-Dead. Perhaps that was a mistake because after finishing B. Stoker's original novel and picking up the sequel brought to light all the plots points and characters that were changed from the original novel. I found it amazing that the entire plot line of the original novel was shifted to get D. Stoker/Holt's plot to fit within the timeframe of the Ripper murders and the launching of a famous ship. I was also floored by one revelation at the end of the novel, which I don't think is even possible whether you believe vampires could exist or not. It also made me flashback to Stephanie Meyer's last Twilight novel, Breaking Dawn.
I've read other novels that alter or make you look at classic fiction in a new light that I have really enjoyed. This was not the case with Dracula the Un-Dead. My advice, stick with the original and if you want modern vampire fiction, check out Anne Rice, Charlaine Harris or Elisabeth Kostova's The Historian.
Eve1972
Written on Jan 12, 2010
This book is getting some horrible reviews, and yes, if you are looking for a sequel to the original, then you are likely to hate it. There is nothing remotely sequel like about this book except for the fact that a relative of Bram Stoker wrote it!
All that being said, I rather enjoyed it, it was fast paced, the characters were interesting, it was just an entertaining read to me.
All that being said, I rather enjoyed it, it was fast paced, the characters were interesting, it was just an entertaining read to me.