In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto

by Michael Pollan

#1 New York Times Bestseller from the author of This is Your Mind on Plants, How to Change Your Mind, The Omnivore's Dilemma, and Food Rules

Food. There's plenty of it around, and we all love to eat it. So why should anyone need to defend it?

Because in the so-called Western diet, food has been replaced by nutrients, and common sense by confusion--most of what we’re consuming today is longer the product of nature but of food science. The result is what Michael Pollan calls the American Paradox: The more we worry about nutrition, the less healthy we see to become. With In Defense of Food, Pollan proposes a new (and very old) answer to the question of what we should eat that comes down to seven simple but liberating words: "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." Pollan’s bracing and eloquent manifesto shows us how we can start making thoughtful food choices that will enrich our lives, enlarge our sense of what it means to be healthy, and bring pleasure back to eating.

• ISBN10: 0143114964
• ISBN13: 9780143114963
• Publish Date: 28 April 2009 (first published 31 December 2007)
• Publish Status: Active
• Publish Country: US
• Imprint: Penguin Books
• Format: Paperback (US Trade)
• Pages: 256
• Language: English
• URL: https://penguinrandomhouse.com/books/isbn/9780143114963

Reviews

[Jeff Sexton]

Enlightening. This book makes its case well, and taught me much I genuinely didn't know - not something I often admit. Very intriguing read, and one I'll likely use as a general guide to healthier eating. No matter what you think about food or weight loss or anything related to the very basic act of eating and the more elaborate structures of cuisine, this book should teach you something and/ or challenge any beliefs you may already have.

[lovelybookshelf]

Originally posted on my blog, A Lovely Bookshelf on the Wall:

"Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." This is the main theme throughout and a good summary of Michael Pollan's In Defense of Food; it even appears on the cover! The book is divided into three parts:

Part 1, The Age of Nutritionism, dismantled a lot of misconceptions I had, leaving me frustrated and suspicious of most nutritional information I've received throughout my life. The problems with research are so complex, with countless variables impossible to isolate. On top of that, business and politics muddy the waters in some pretty despicable ways.

Part 2, The Western Diet and the Diseases of Civilization, is where I started to feel bogged down. Reading this section was slow going, but I greatly appreciated the how thorough and well-researched it was.

Part 3, Getting Over Nutritionism, contains practical advice applicable to daily living. Pollan also addressed some questions that came up while reading the previous two sections, which helped the book feel cohesive. This is a useful, valuable section I often feel is missing from other books in this genre.

Although In Defense of Food started out with a bang, I found it gradually grew less and less interesting. The political and economic ties to how our food culture has deteriorated was the most eye-opening to me, but that was in the first section of the book. The rest of the information is fantastic, but most of it wasn't terribly new to me: I've heard or read the same ideas elsewhere, and a lot of it is just common sense.

If parts 1 and 2 interest you, read this book! If you're considering it mostly for the information contained in part 3, you might want to skip it and read Hungry by Darlene Barnes instead: same information delivered as a memoir, fun to read, with some very simple recipes scattered throughout.

[Briana @ Pages Unbound]

Pollan begins his book–and even prints on the cover–the simple directions that are the premise of his work: “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.” If people would adhere to these three rules, their health and the environment would be much improved and actually reading the book would be superfluous. However, many need some convincing to change their diets, and Pollan is prepared to tell them in clear, direct language what is wrong with what American eat and how they eat it, what problems result (Western diseases, including heart disease, diabetes, and cancer apparently), and what steps can be taken to solve them. Yes, people should eat food–but Pollan will define “food” as something with recognizable ingredients and without high fructose corn syrup. He also tells readers how they can work to “not eat too much food” and explains why he believes everyone needs to eat more plants. Pollan does not address every problem (many people cannot afford organic foods, for example, and Pollan never acknowledges this fact) and the book can be somewhat redundant, but it is a surprisingly engaging read and will inspire readers at least to reconsider those cookies they were eying.