The Tragedy of King Richard III

by William Shakespeare

John Jowett

Richard III is one of Shakespeare's most popular plays on the stage and has been adapted successfully for film. This new and innovative edition recognizes the play's pre-eminence as a performance work: a perspective that informs every aspect of the editing. Challenging traditional practice, the text is based on the 1597 Quarto which, it is argued, brings us closest to the play as it would have been staged in Shakespeare's theatre. The introduction, which is illustrated, explores the long performance history from Shakespeare's time to the present. Its critical engagement with the play responds to recent historicist and gender-based approaches. The commentary gives detailed explication of matters of language, staging, text, and historical and cultural contexts, providing coverage that is both carefully balanced and alert to nuance of meaning. Documentation of the extensive textual variants is organized for maximum clarity: the readings of the Folio and the Quarto are presented in separate banks, and more specialist information is given at the back of the book. Appendices also include selected passages from the main source and a special index of actors and other theatrical personnel.

• ISBN10: 0192839934
• ISBN13: 9780192839930
• Publish Date: 4 January 2001 (first published 14 December 2000)
• Publish Status: Out of Print
• Out of Print: 10 July 2008
• Publish Country: GB
• Publisher: Oxford University Press
• Imprint: Oxford Paperbacks
• Format: Paperback
• Pages: 423
• Language: English

Reviews

[clementine]

My biggest issue with Richard III is that it's so damn hard to follow, what with all the related characters who have names and then titles that are used interchangeably. It took me a lot longer to get through than Taming of the Shrew, because I had to constantly force myself to slow down so I could understand everything that was going on.

I really do tend to like the tragedies more, but perhaps because I found that it wasn't easily followed, I was not the biggest fan of Richard III. I didn't hate it, though - I thought Richard was an interesting character, one who was clearly malicious but who was designed to stir some amount of sympathy. I thought that the exploration of his psychology was very interesting and well-done. The end was particularly effective, when he realizes to some degree that he isolated himself by murdering everybody who would have allied with him.

I liked it alright, and I liked it more when we deconstructed it in class. Still not my favourite.