Reviewed by clementine on
SO. There were a lot of very quotable parts of Cat's Cradle that really resonated with me. And the exploration of religion and politics and corruption was great. This is post-apocalyptic in a much different way from what I usually read, and I liked that. It was new and different, and since I've been reading a lot of YA dystopian that blends together in a puddle of mediocrity, that's always welcome.
I feel like I need to read this book a hundred more times to really "get" it. It's so complex, full of paradoxes and metaphors and all sorts of things that I really don't feel I fully got the first time. I never do completely get books the first time I read them (and I almost always enjoy them exponentially more the second time), but this is different to me. This feels deceptively simple, like while you're reading it it's easy to follow but when you finish you realize it's a tangled web underneath the surface. But then again, maybe that's just what I'm supposed to believe. It would certainly play into the exploration of reality and truth that is present in Cat's Cradle.
This isn't even a proper review, it's just... thoughts. Thoughts in the form of word vomit, really.
I don't know, man. I enjoyed it, but I need to read it again. I feel like I'm missing something, or maybe it's just the book that's missing something. It confused me, at least, and maybe that makes me stupid or a poor reader, but I just don't know what to make of it.
Reading updates
- Started reading
- 2 October, 2012: Finished reading
- 2 October, 2012: Reviewed