Reviewed by clq on
It didn't.
That's not to say this book wasn't really good, because it was. But so are a lot of other books, and the first two books in the series were so good that I was expecting more of the same. In Abaddon's Gate the story went from being something that felt fresh and special to something that felt more like an ordinary good book.
Whereas the other books had plots that were complex, and (satisfyingly) felt even more complex than they actually were, this one keeps it relatively simple. It builds upon the underlying politics and tensions from the previous books, but the narrative isn't driven by them at all. The previous books spent time carefully constructing the culture, the history, and various subtleties of the different fractions that feature in these stories. In this book the fractions might as well have been named Team Red, Team Blue, and Team Green, and it would hardly have made a difference to the story.
The story also felt like it was there to get the plot of the series from a given point to another point. Rather than feeling like the characters controlled what was happening, which I got plenty of from the two previous books, this one made it feel like the characters were doing what they had to do for a given outcome to occur. For the first time I didn't find myself empathising with them.
Now, while it might sound like I disliked this book, I really didn't. Abaddon's Gate was still a page-turner, still has a good story, and is still a book I'd heartily recommend. It also has some scenes and moments that are really brilliant. It's just a little bit of a let-down to have to say that about a book which I expected to be really brilliant throughout. I'm holding onto the hope that the next one will step the series back up to where it was after Book 2 - and beyond.
Reading updates
- Started reading
- 19 December, 2017: Finished reading
- 19 December, 2017: Reviewed