Reviewed by jamiereadthis on
My nitpick is how Durant editorializes in places, such as dismissing sexuality with the biases of his time, or ascribing humanism to ideas too early for it. It stands out because he stays objective elsewhere (and because I’ve been reading extensively on those subjects from other sources).
Which makes it just as interesting an artifact, IMO. All history gets shared through some lens, and we do well to remember.
Reading updates
- Started reading
- 6 April, 2020: Finished reading
- 6 April, 2020: Reviewed