Reviewed by ladygrey on
Since [b:Helen of Troy|10114|Helen of Troy|Margaret George|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1166115554s/10114.jpg|12851] is written from the first person point of view of Helen, she needed to be a compelling woman of intelligence and strength and force of will caught in the tides of love and politics and the gods and that would have been interesting. Unfortunately, [a:Margaret George|3356|Fyodor Dostoevsky|http://photo.goodreads.com/authors/1251797195p2/3356.jpg]'s Helen is nearly as paltry as other accounts have portrayed her, just more detailed.
The love story wasn't strong enough to propel the world into war. I didn't fall in love with Paris and I needed to if I was going to understand why Helen loved him and left her child for him.
The writing, I thought, was almost too simple and straight forward and despite how long the book is I felt it remained always on the surface of the story, skimming over moments and details without depth or weight or intrigue.
Any story of historical fiction that examines a particular moment in time labors under the burden of an audience that already knows how it ends. In order to be worthy of the retelling the story needs to bring something new or exciting to what we know and I don't think [b:Helen of Troy|10114|Helen of Troy|Margaret George|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1166115554s/10114.jpg|12851] managed that.
Reading updates
- Started reading
- 1 March, 2010: Finished reading
- 1 March, 2010: Reviewed