The "Picture of Dorian Gray"

by Sparknotes

[thepunktheory]

Book vs. Movie:
Oscar Wilde's only novel is a classic. Although I didn't like it as much as many of his other works it is still an interesting story.
But when I watched the movie I was beyond disappointed.
First of all: they changed huge chunks of the story. While I understand that the alterations in Dorian's relationship with Sibyl Vane make it easier to grasp (as some parts of the book may seem a little strange, especially from today's point of view), I have no idea why they had to introduce a new character(Lord Henry Wotton's daughter) who becomes romantically entangled. This simply annoyed me. It was completely unnecessary, didn't add anything to the film. On the contrary: it didn't match the vibe and also somehow made Dorian's transition by far shallower. I won't even begin talking about the dreadful ending of the movie. I despise it.
Besides the story being completely changed, I also wasn't too fond of the casting choices. Colin Firth wasn't the right match for Henry Wotton. He makes the character so very different from the book. But who I really couldn't deal with is Rebecca Hall. She plays Wotton's daughter and is supposed to be 18 years old. No way. In 2009 she was already 27 years old and precisely looks like that. Basically the entire plotline with her that was for some reason added annoyed the shit out of me as it took so much depth form the story.
The movie keeps dragging on, making you wish it was over after the first ten minutes. Even the opening scene was boring. I have no clue why they didn't start the way it was in the book. In Basil Hallward's studio while he's painting Dorian. It would have been a wonderful opening for the film, intriguing from the first moment on.

Well, all I can say about the 2009 adaptation is that it's downright awful. I'm sure Oscar Wilde is rotating in his grave because of what they did to his novel.