The Good Brother by Chris Offutt

The Good Brother

by Chris Offutt

Virgil Caudill has always toed the line of the law, leaving the hell-raising to his brother, Boyd. Now Boyd is dead, and everyone - even the sheriff and Virgil's own mother - expects Virgil to avenge the death, fulfilling the old, unwritten code of the Kentucky hills. Virgil cannot break that code, but he is determined to escape the cycle of retaliation. He gives up not only his modest hopes but his identity and, like countless fugitives before him, heads west. There, among people who are as foreign to him as the stark Montana landscape, he finds love, purpose, community - all that he left behind. But just when his dreams are within reach, the past overtakes him, with devastating consequences.

Reviewed by jamiereadthis on

2 of 5 stars

Share
There’s so much good meat for a story here, it’s ridiculous. A man who doesn’t want to kill to avenge his brother’s death and semi-joins up with a supremacist militia he doesn’t believe in? This is a joke, right? Those are killer ingredients for a story, and I have proof. But, while there’s Boyd, the wild, dead brother, and all of the crew back in Kentucky, and all of the crew out in Montana, we spend every second of our time with... Virgil. And Virgil, though things do pick up after he gets shot, is, in the first half, a sack of wet feed, and the latter, a sack of wet feed with slightly more backbone. He should be so fascinating. He should be so complex. But, he drifts along, and never thinks or feels a surprising thing. He tries to be honest, but it’s not interesting. A man with no vices or guts doesn’t seem half honest, anyway.

It sure doesn’t stack well story-wise against the man who, we’re told, must have the truth in him somewhere “because it ain’t never come out yet.” Whose former running buddies are, we’re told, “the incarcerated, the dead, and the recently religious.” The wild, dead Boyd is beloved, and best by those who wanted to kill him, and maybe it’s not fair to compare the promise of that story to the one we got, but it’s torture to have it lurking around the edges while Virgil swaps driver’s licenses or doesn’t get drunk or quietly weeps.

So, with the letdown of an ending this was somewhat of a bust. I’ve got a book of Offutt’s short stories, though, and I’m excited for it, because if the focus is on the strengths it should inherently solve some of the long-form problems here. Take for example Virgil meeting up with Orben near the end: while in context it’s a huge contrivance, trimmed down and on its own it’s a damn good story, and with that great, riffing dialogue, just the kind of thing I’d want to read.

One thing I did learn: no more Montana as the backup plan for me. It’s one gorgeous place and just the kind of wilderness I love but, comparing it like Virgil does to Kentucky, which is so close to home— I was getting so homesick I couldn’t stand it. The loss of fireflies, and barbecue, and Appalachian autumns, and the close, humid hills and dew and dusk, and the nosy, friendly, wild, tell-you-everything-in-a-minute people: I couldn’t take it, no sir. That’s home.

Last modified on

Reading updates

  • Started reading
  • 20 April, 2012: Finished reading
  • 20 April, 2012: Reviewed