What I liked about The Things I'd Miss was the fact that, at the beginning, we're introduced to Lucy, and her husband and her kids, and we can see that her life isn't perhaps how she had planned it to be - 5am wake-up calls (that would end in MURDER in my house, fyi), fights about anything and everything, and kids who barely give you the peace and quiet Lucy so craves. Then, when the accident occurs, the novel hops around, from place to place - Lucy in Uni, Lucy as a kid, back and forth we go, with no linear storytelling, until a mystical being appears, and Lucy ends up back as a kid, and works her way back to her Uni days, and back to Hugh, whom she professes to love. If I'm honest, I preferred the hopping back and forth, to times in Lucy's life that seemed to define her as a person, I liked the zig-zag pulled from one place to another feel, because once the story settled into its Hugh/Lucy love-fest, I didn't find it as compelling.
Lucy's Uni days are certainly interesting, and I loved getting to know Hugh, Simon, Lucy herself, and her best friend Gemma, but what I couldn't understand was why, if Lucy liked Hugh as much as she says she does, why she didn't say anything! Wouldn't you just have told him, all those years ago? It's clear there's mutual feelings between the two of them, but for some reason or another, neither of them confessed to it, until Lucy ended up revisiting her memories after her crash. If you're going to write a novel about a great, Romeo-and-Juliet-type romance, there needs to be solid ground, and while I felt their connection, it seemed entirely pointless considering the fact they'd both stayed completely silent, and they were just friends for as long as they knew each other. I wanted more honesty! But, of course, if there had been honesty, and they had confessed their feelings, there would have, perhaps, been no book.
Overall, it was an interesting read. I wouldn't go so far as to compare it to a JoJo Moyes read, especially as, at times, I found the narrative quite jarring - too many exclamation marks and italicised writing, Lucy's mum talks to 5-year-old Lucy in the most awful, excruciating way, and 5-year-old Lucy talks and thinks like, well, not a 5-year-old. I also STRONGLY oppose the fact Clover made Kipper the dog go in the car with Lucy, when she crashed. That's just plain mean. But the pace wasn't too bad, and the novel skipped along quite well, it wasn't the perfect read, but it was enjoyable and I actually liked seeing Simon's progression the most - he's rather left out, when it comes to Hugh and Lucy, and yet he's always there, always present, and he's a sneaky bugger, which I liked. The Things I'd Miss is definitely a thinker, and there was a lot I liked about the novel and I do love a good going-back-in-time novel!
WIN!
To win yourself a copy of The Things I'd miss, see the Rafflecopter giveaway below! :)
a Rafflecopter giveaway
This review was originally posted on Girls Love To Read