Reviewed by Terri M. LeBlanc on
I picked up Peter Pan after reading Code Name Verity. I was intrigued by the number of "Pan" references in "Verity" and thought, as a children's classic novel it would be easy to digest. Plus I wanted to read the source material that provided a bit of inspiration for my favorite read of 2014.
The first step was finding a version of the novel that wasn't oversized and illustrated or abridged. None of the versions at my local library seemed to fit the bill. After some searching online, I found there were several free versions as "Pan" is in the public domain, but the formatting was so atrocious that I could not get into the story. I finally shelled out 99 cents for an electronic version of the book.
With the book in hand, I started to read and found it very hard to like the story. I think modern media has done a fantastic job at picking out and expanding on the themes Barrie presents in Peter Pan. As a novel, I found it a bit difficult to ignore the movie and play versions that I'm familiar with. As a result, I felt like I was treading water, waiting for the engagement with the story to kick in which never happened.
Maybe read aloud to children, Peter Pan would be quite in engaging. For me, I found Wendy to be whiny, Michael and John to be non-existent, Hook was a floozy, the parents were idiots and Peter was quite mean. Which was probably the most surprising bit to me, as many of the modern adaptations have Peter being a lonely, soft-hearted boy seeking a family.
Peter Pan by J.M. Barrie receives a thumbs down. For me, this may one of the few cases where adaptations may do the book a better service than the original source material. I found it difficult to connect with the characters and get past what I know from the adaptations to see the possible brilliance in the original story.
This review was originally posted on Second Run Reviews.
Reading updates
- Started reading
- 29 October, 2014: Finished reading
- 29 October, 2014: Reviewed