The Year of the Flood by Margaret Atwood

The Year of the Flood (The Maddaddam Trilogy, #2)

by Margaret Atwood

Adam One, the kindly leader of the God's Gardeners - a religion devoted to the melding of science and religion, the preservation of all species, the tending of the Earth, and the cultivation of bees and organic crops on flat rooftops - has long predicted the Waterless Flood. Now it has occurred, obliterating most human life. Two women have avoided it: the young trapeze-dancer, Ren, locked into the high-end sex club, Scales and Tails; and former SecretBurgers meat-slinger turned Gardener, Toby, barricaded into the luxurious AnooYoo Spa, where many of the treatments are edible. Have others survived? Ren's bioartist friend Amanda, or the MaddAddam eco-fighters? Ren's one-time teenage lover, Jimmy? Or the murderous Painballers, survivors of the mutual-elimination Painball prison? Not to mention the CorpSeCorps, the shadowy and corrupt policing force of the ruling powers...Meanwhile, in the natural world, gene-spliced life forms are proliferating: the lion/lamb blends, the Mo'hair sheep with human hair, the pigs with human brain tissue.
As Adam One and his intrepid hemp-clad band make their way through a ruined world, singing their devotional hymns and faithful to their creed and to their Saints - Saint Francis Assisi, Saint Rachel Carson, and Saint Al Gore among them - what odds for Ren and Toby, and for the human race? By turns dark, tender, violent, thoughtful and uneasily hilarious, The Year of the Flood is Atwood at her most effective.

Reviewed by clementine on

3 of 5 stars

Share
I thought this was a more compelling narrative than Oryx and Crake, which just felt a little unfinished to me. The characters were definitely more interesting, as was the focus on the environmentalist religion, which had a robust theology. The ultra-capitalist dystopian world on the brink of environmental disaster is pretty much believable. This did start lagging for me in the middle, and I'm just still not totally convinced. I don't know what it is, but there's something about this series that I'm not connecting with fully. Maybe it's just that I always think Atwood is at her best when she's meticulously deconstructing women's relationships with the world as we know it, which makes something like this seem like a waste of her talents, no matter how competently-done.

Last modified on

Reading updates

  • Started reading
  • 9 July, 2019: Finished reading
  • 9 July, 2019: Reviewed