Amelia Peabody is Elizabeth Peters' most brilliant and best-loved creation, a thoroughly Victorian feminist who takes the stuffy world of archaeology by storm with her shocking men's pants and no-nonsense attitude!
In this first adventure, our headstrong heroine decides to use her substantial inheritance to see the world. On her travels, she rescues a gentlewoman in distress - Evelyn Barton-Forbes - and the two become friends. The two companions continue to Egypt where they face mysteries, mummies and the redoubtable Radcliffe Emerson, an outspoken archaeologist, who doesn't need women to help him solve mysteries -- at least that's what he thinks!
'Think Miss Marple with early feminist gloss crossed with Indiana Jones... Dastardly deeds, whirlwind romances, curious mummies and all the fun and intrigue of Egyptian excavations, with a heroine who wields a sturdy parasol rather than a magnum. Accomplished entertainment.' Guardian
- ISBN10 1845293886
- ISBN13 9781845293888
- Publish Date 25 May 2006 (first published 1 December 1975)
- Publish Status Active
- Publish Country GB
- Publisher Little, Brown Book Group
- Imprint Robinson Publishing
- Format Paperback
- Pages 320
- Language English
Reviews
bookperson
jesstheaudiobookworm
I began listening to Crocodile on the Sandbank because I find egyptology and archaeology fascinating. I think I've seen every documentary that exists on the subject of egyptology, but I haven't read that many books pertaining to it. Going into Crocodile on the Sandbank, I thought the Egyptian setting and archaeology premise would be my bread and butter, sustaining me throughout the book. And although that didn't disappoint, it was actually the Peters' characters that proved most interesting.
While listening to Crocodile on the Sandbank, I related to Amelia Peabody hard. First of all, she's hilarious in a dry, sarcastic manner that oddly reminded me of Stephanie Plum, but in a more civilized 19th-century way. Amelia also kind of reminded me of Claire Fraser, in that she seemed at ahead of her time (in Claire's case, she is literally ahead of her time...).
Amelia was clearly written to be an avant-garde protagonist and she nearly pulls it off. Perhaps in the 1970s (when Crocodile on the Sandbank was written), Peabody would have been considered a strong female lead, but in the 21st-century, she doesn't entirely fit the bill. When Emerson enters the story, Amelia "no man is as sensible as me" Peabody slowly morphs into a more traditional 19th-century woman, gradually playing second fiddle to Emerson, personally and professionally. Still, my slight disappointment at this was largely overwhelmed by the hilarious banter between Emerson and Peabody and the fact that they still call each other by their surnames right up to the end of the book. Seriously, that cracks me up.
Overall, I liked Emerson as a character. Sure, he infuriated me to begin with, just as he did Amelia. But he played the role of 19th-century man with a British superiority complex perfectly. Honestly, it was almost hard to stay mad at him because he was being so ridiculously pigheaded that I couldn't help but laugh. And Amelia always put him in his place. But my favorite thing about Emerson was the growth he showed over the course of the book. The effect of Amelia's presence on him was obvious and refreshing. He hadn't done a complete 180 by the end of the book, because that would be unrealistic, but he had mellowed enough to show Amelia's affect on him and that' was adorable.
Minor spoiler: This was the ultimate enemies-to-lovers sub-plot and I am all about that trope! I really didn't see it coming until about 75% into the story. It was that well-developed, almost like a slow burn romance. The last few minutes of the book acted as an epilogue (which gave me all the feels), but also seemed premature, given that 19 more books follow in the series. It makes me wonder if Crocodile on the Sandbank was originally intended to be a standalone.
With all things considered, the mystery was the weaker part of the story for me. It wasn't necessarily a "weak" mystery or plot, just not as strong as the character development (which I was more interested in anyway). I thought the "who" part of the mystery was relatively obvious. It was rather comical when the characters made a big deal of revealing what I had basically known for the last three hours, but there were still some smaller details of it that I hadn't put together (the "how" and "why").
By the 75% mark, I was glued to the story, hanging on every word and fully invested in the characters. That's my biggest take away from Crocodile on the Sandbank. This is a 20 book series- If I'm going to be spending so much time with these characters, I'd better like them and care what happens to them. They are the common denominators between the installments. They are the cornerstone of the series. In Crocodile on the Sandbank, Elizabeth Peters has laid a sturdy foundation for my enjoyment of the rest of the series.
Narration review: As many audiobooks do, Crocodile on the Sandbank opens with an introduction from an unknown reader, setting the scene and telling you what you're about to hear. However, in this case, the introductory reader was not so unknown to me. It was none other than Davina Porter, narrator of the Outlander series. Trust me, after spending literally hundreds of hours listening to her voice, I can recognize it at the drop of a hat. Anyway, I remember thinking that I wish I hadn't heard Davina's voice right before listening to an audiobook narrated by someone else, because that someone else had no hope of comparing to Porter... Boy, was I wrong.
There are two recordings of Crocodile on the Sandbank. I purposefully chose the one narrated by Barbara Rosenblat because I recognized her name from Orange is the New Black (she played Miss Rosa). After exactly one sentence, I knew I was in good hands. Audiobooks narrated by experienced actors are generally amazing anyway, but Rosenblat exceeded my expectations. She is incredible. I haven't even heard the sample of Susan O'Malley's version of Crocodile on the Sandbank, but I'm going to go ahead and recommend Barbara Rosenblat's to you because there's no way anyone could have done it any better.
Update- I just listened to O'Malley's sample and I was totally right. Besides, O'Malley only narrated the first six audiobooks in the series, so you would have to eventually switch over to Rosenblat's narration anyway. You may as well start with her from the beginning. ♣︎
nitzan_schwarz
It kind of reminded me a little bit of Gail Carriger's [b:Soulless|6381205|Soulless (Parasol Protectorate, #1)|Gail Carriger|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1314020848s/6381205.jpg|6569140] in that we have a serious, smart, no-nonsense spinster who goes against the Victorian traditions and normalities and ends up tangled in a messy adventure. No supernatural elements, though, and I think I like Soulless quite a bit better, as I liked the pace and relationship there more. Also, this makes me want to re-read that lol
What I mean by that is that here everyone fell in love in a week. And, yes, kudos to Peters for managing to make that time seem a LOT longer with everything that has been happening. But still, Evelyn is pretty much in love with Walter from day one, and that's kind of a pet peeve of mine. Also, Emerson's final love confession ruined a lot of it for me. I mean, I ABSOLUTELY loved their "marriage proposals". The banter and their fake "I'm doing this to further my goal" (from both of them) was so On Brand and perfect for this series. So I was bummed that it was followed with an out of character exclamation of love and devotion.
I also figured out the entire plot from a considerably early point. It was still a good one, if a bit convoluted. I'm interested in reading more of these but they are also not high priority.
jamiereadthis
MurderByDeath
Mystereity Reviews
inlibrisveritas
I found that the main character Amelia, is a character where you simply can't like her to begin with because of their immediate strong personality. She is a strong willed and independent woman, but after about a chapter or two she was beginning to grow on me because of those. In the time period that this is set I found that her personality was perfect and different enough that she wasn't just another woman of the time.
The writing style is in the first person, which typically can become annoying since it's only from one point of view and it makes it difficult to connect with the other characters but Peters does it wonderfully. It's definitely one of those cozy mysteries that you could easily pick up and read on a rainy weekend. You get a great idea as to what the others are really like because Amelia is quite vocal on what is thinks of them and her situation. As for the "whodunnit" part of the book it's not terribly hard to figure out who is behind it all, in fact I would be surprised if someone didn't figure it out before the final three chapters. But surprisingly that really didn't detract from the story for me, because there were still somethings that I wondered about that made it so it didn't matter to me that I had it figured out. Overall I enjoyed the book alot and I am pretty sure that once I manage to shrink my to-read list a little more the second book in this series will have earned it's place on the must have list for me.
I recommend this to those who love cozy mysteries with a historical twist, or someone who loves historical fiction dealing with archaeology or ancient Egypt.