ladygrey
Written on Nov 27, 2011
Her heroines are naive and self-centered. Which, for me, makes them unlikable. Now, I understand that in the time periods women probably were very sheltered and therefore their naivete is probably historically accurate. I also understand that she's trying to make her heroines flawed so they have a chance to grow and change through the course of the story. Neither of those factors make me like them any more and I don't really enjoy reading books where I don't like the main character, especially when it's written in first person.
The saving grace of this book is that the supporting characters are interesting once you get far enough into it. You kind of have to sludge through the first, probably third of the book but once Allie opens up a little and gets to know the people around her, they're likable and they're fun and they're the reason I kept reading and moderately enjoyed the book.
Also, Austin is weird with her romance. In both books I read she built a romance with one guy then shifted her happy ending to another guy. In the first book ([b:A Proper Pursuit|1793400|A Proper Pursuit|Lynn Austin|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188425098s/1793400.jpg|1792389]) it was less obvious because there were a couple of guys she had in the fire and it's more a matter of taste who was the more romantic. But in [b:Wonderland Creek|10329441|Wonderland Creek|Lynn Austin|http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51pkUPQBg1L._SL75_.jpg|15231932] she totally builds a romance with one guy and it's sweet and it's fun but then it's over and suddenly she's happily ever after with someone else, who you knew she was going to end up with but who there wasn't any romantic foundation to their friendship. Which is fine, until you get to the last page where suddenly their friendship has leapt into happily ever after together.