Neuromancer (Sprawl Trilogy, #1) (Remembering Tomorrow)

by William Gibson

Winner of the Hugo, Nebula, and Philip K. Dick Awards, Neuromancer is a science fiction masterpiece—a classic that ranks as one of the twentieth century’s most potent visions of the future.

Case was the sharpest data-thief in the matrix—until he crossed the wrong people and they crippled his nervous system, banishing him from cyberspace. Now a mysterious new employer has recruited him for a last-chance run at an unthinkably powerful artificial intelligence. With a dead man riding shotgun and Molly, a mirror-eyed street-samurai, to watch his back, Case is ready for the adventure that upped the ante on an entire genre of fiction.

Neuromancer was the first fully-realized glimpse of humankind’s digital future—a shocking vision that has challenged our assumptions about technology and ourselves, reinvented the way we speak and think, and forever altered the landscape of our imaginations.

• ISBN10: 0441007465
• ISBN13: 9780441007462
• Publish Date: 1 July 2000 (first published 1 July 1984)
• Publish Status: Active
• Out of Print: 5 March 2013
• Publish Country: US
• Publisher: Penguin Putnam Inc
• Imprint: Ace Books
• Format: Paperback (US Trade)
• Pages: 336
• Language: English
• URL: https://penguinrandomhouse.com/books/isbn/9780441007462

Reviews

[adamfortuna]

Yet another cyberpunk book that I didn't love. It's funny how much I love this genre in movie form, but can't stand it in book form. It's easy to appreciate this one though. Seeing how much this one parallels The Matrix was crazy.

[Michael @ Knowledge Lost]

To be honest I was expecting something completely different when I set out to read Neuromancer. I was expecting a cyber-punk book but I think this was more of a sci-fi book with a lot of references to computers. I was expecting hackers, but I think William Gibson did a good job imagining hackers of the future. I was expecting outdated technology and while there was a small amount in the book, it was still very futuristic. This is the second Williiam Gibson book I’ve read (the other being The Difference Machine) and I kind of feel like his books can become confusing and can leave the reader with an uncertainty of what is actually happening. While Gibson is a very engaging writer about from my beef with complexity, I think this book left me wanting something different. I really think if I read this book in the 80’s it would of been a different story.

[empressbrooke]

I find myself at a loss to describe how I felt about this book. In some ways, it wasn't really that great - the characters are 2D at best, the first third of the book lacks any explanation or definitions to help acclimate the reader to the new world (for a while I was convinced I was going to read the whole book without having any idea what actually happened), and the whole thing seemed vague (who was doing what and why?).

By the end, though, things cleared up, I felt more comfortable with the vocab, and I closed the book feeling as if I'd been somewhere. A book that sends me somewhere is a book worth reading, no matter what frustrations it takes to do it.

Sitting in the middle of the Internet era, it's obviously difficult to evaluate Gibson's amazing prescience, but I will say that his seeming concern from his intro in the 20th Anniversary Edition about the book's lack of cell phones is really unwarranted. Everything in Neuromancer's world fits just so, and it never would have occurred to me that it was odd no one was picking up a cell phone to contact each other.