Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead (Acting Edition S.) (An Evergreen book)

by Tom Stoppard

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead is one of the most enduring and frequently performed plays of contemporary theater and has firmly established itself in the dramatic canon. Acclaimed as a modern masterpiece, it is the fabulously inventive tale of Hamlet as told from the worm's-eye view of the bewildered Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, two minor characters in Shakespeare's play. In Tom Stoppard's best-known work, this Shakespearean Laurel and Hardy finally get a chance to take the lead role, but do so in a world where echoes of Waiting for Godot resound, where reality and illusion intermix, and where fate leads our two heroes to a tragic but inevitable end. Revised and reissued to commemorate the fiftieth anniversary of the play's first performance, this definitive edition includes a new introduction and previously unpublished ancillary material.

• ISBN13: 9780802126214
• Publish Date: 11 April 2017 (first published May 1967)
• Publish Status: Active
• Publish Country: US
• Imprint: Grove Press / Atlantic Monthly Press
• Edition: 50th Anniversary ed.
• Format: Paperback (US Trade)
• Pages: 128
• Language: English

Reviews

[Amber (The Literary Phoenix)]

It’s been a really long time – almost a decade – since I’ve tried to decipher the hidden meanings behind a play. But I’m going to try! I’m pretty sure that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead is about … death. I suppose that shouldn’t be a revelation, since it’s in the title, but man I struggled with this one?

Honestly, this play just made me feel stupid. I feel like there must have been some exciting and deep conversation to be had about this play. Maybe it’s the sort of thing that’s a bit lost in translation? Maybe it’s better with group discussion and guidance? I know plays come across better when they have been seen and not read, but I actually had more trouble figuring out (what I thought) the point of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead was than any other play that comes to mind. But, like I said, it’s be a while?

Also, I don’t suppose it helped this used copy had copies notes on the backside of the front cover about modernism in theatre and the world of the play.

Okay, outside of the confusion about the characters (who were constantly trying to remember who was who and what was happening) I enjoyed the concept of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. I think it’s so cool that Stoppard took two minor characters out of Hamlet in order to explore the story more. It’s almost like fan fiction – as a reader, I know there’s been many times where I wanted to know more about a minor character, or else the story abandoned a storyline I really enjoyed and I wish I had gotten to learn more. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead is great for that. Especially if you’re a fan of Hamlet! It’s always cool to get more.

A lot of this play focused on philosophical conversation. There was talk about the meaning of death, the way other characters mourned, and the knowledge of mortality. The speeches were interesting to me. The idle, repetitive conversation was not. Again, this is something I think would probably come across better in the stage performance as opposed to just reading the lines.

I can see where this could be a good play, and I can see where it would be amusing in person. I don’t think this is the best one to translate to simply reading the play however. If you like Shakespeare, meaningful dialogue, and a smidge of comedy, I do recommend taking in a performance!

Just, eh. I know a lot of people love it but I don't see what's to great about it. Maybe I read it too quickly or didn't dig deep enough but this book just didn't really do it for me. It's short enough that I didn't feel like I wasted my time reading it though. I did however recently see a short bit of the film adaption in which R&G are flipping a coin and enjoyed it quite thoroughly (the class that day was on randomization and probability) so perhaps I should revisit it now that I'm a bit older.