Divergent (Divergent, #1)

by Veronica Roth

Emma Galvin (Narrator)

She turns to the future in a world that's falling apart.

The No. 1 New York Times bestseller DIVERGENT - also a major motion picture.

For sixteen-year-old Tris, the world changes in a heartbeat when she is forced to make a terrible choice. Turning her back on her family, Tris ventures out, alone, determined to find out where she truly belongs.

Shocked by the brutality of her new life, Tris can trust no one. And yet she is drawn to a boy who seems to both threaten and protect her. The hardest choices may yet lie ahead....

The first book in the DIVERGENT series that has swept the globe - selling millions of copies world-wide.

• ISBN10: 1624061567
• ISBN13: 9781624061561
• Publish Date: 1 May 2011
• Publish Status: Unknown
• Imprint: Dreamscape Media
• Format: Audiobook
• Language: English

Reviews

[moraa]

2.5 stars

[thepunktheory]

Full Review on: my Blog ThePunkTheory

The Divergent series was one of the big YA hits of the last years, but I didn't enjoy it exactly as much as apparently everybody else.
To be honest, I didn't like any of the characters. Most of the time Tris is an annoying brat - either complaining or whining. Four is quite stereotypical and the whole love-story between them is absolutely unnecessary.
You get the picture, it's definitely not my favorite book.

[maggiefan]

Well... Surprisingly, I enjoyed this book a lot more than I thought. BUT it doesnt mean that I enjoyed it a lot. I was entertained, you may say. I started to read this book with such low expectations, so it worked for me. I wasnt very dissapointed, neither I was surprised by the plot or the characters. It was just a fun read, nothing more than that.
P. S. Yeah, I admit, this book has a lot of plot holes and stupid things in it, but... Oh god, how refreshing it was to read about a romance (sometimes VERY stupid) and not about A FREAKING LOVE TRIANGLE AGAIN.

[sstaley]

I finally got around to reading this book, because it's the rule at my house that we read the book before we see the movie. I really liked it! This is one of those times I wish that goodreads had 1/2 star increments. I would give this book 4 1/2 stars. There were only a few things that bugged me about the world in Divergent, but it stopped me from giving it 5 stars. Overall it was a quick read that I didn't want to put down. My teen daughter also loved it!

[layawaydragon]

I get why people are saying it's the next Hunger Games (or at least was when it came out) but the idea behind the fractions is just silly. Remind me of Captain Planet and not in a good way. People are not just one thing, they don't fit in boxes. While I gladly say people suck, these are just the worst of the worst boxes. And no, there isn't some special cult that I'd just love to join. How about running away from Chicago? Is that possible, can we do that?

Though I did like the bit with Tris and her mom. And the violence, it was interesting though the deaths are shrugged off like red shirts.

Tris is definitely a special snowflake that is annoying and fall insta-love with her teacher. I like Four's type but he's bland. Then he ends up being a special snowflake too. *sigh*

But everything else is just like why? And how the hell did we end up here? And what about the rest of the US and the world? Are there factions all over the country that have to report to higher ups? Or is Chicago it's own special sort of hell? Did they kill off all the minorities in Chicago before or after dissolving into factions? Did they perform surgery a ala Uglies or genetics tampering or breeding programs or something to make people fall into fractions? Because I really don't see how Tris could be special. It's just the hideous "I'm special and ya'll are sheeple, god" aspect of being a teenager escalated to society wide nonsense.

[CrowNoYami]

I really enjoyed the twists and turns that this book took. It never kept to the original thought process and therefor kept you interested for the whole book.

[Rinn]

This is actually a review of a re-read of Divergent, as I first read it in 2012 and at that point rated it 4 stars. It was chosen as a Book of the Month for my Goodreads book group last year, but I didn’t have access to my copy, as I was living in the Netherlands at the time. I then decided to read and finally review it after coming back to the UK. I also wanted to re-read it because I felt it wouldn’t be quite as good the second time round – now that I’ve read so much more YA dystopian fiction, which has very much flooded the market in the past few years.

Just a note that this review will contain spoilers for the first book, Divergent. My reviews do not usually contain spoilers, but I really wanted to discuss some of my issues with this one, which cannot be done spoiler-free.

Firstly, I really need to question the whole system of Divergent. Is Chicago the only city left? What happened to the rest of the world? And why oh why did they think a faction system, especially one that relies on every person having one characteristic, help? Surely the fact that people can choose to switch factions only encourages Divergence? And I’m pretty sure everyone in the world would be Divergent. There’s no way that all of those people aren’t brave AND clever AND kind AND selfless AND honest. Does that mean anyone who is not in Candor is dishonest? Surely then their government would be a mess, as it’s run only by Abnegation? And speaking of Abnegation, whose smart idea was it to let just one faction be effectively in charge? Sure, they’re supposed to be ‘selfless’ but if there are Divergents out there then that only means there is a chance of corruption. I’m also pretty sure that being selfless does not equal being a good leader.

I had to sigh when Tris was described as ‘plain’. Of course, of course. Why are basically all YA dystopian heroines plain? And white, and blonde. And then of course the moody ‘bad’ boy with the mysterious past is interested in the ‘plain’ girl, who of course is special and talented. I am so so bored of this kind of romantic trope.

More questions. Why do only half of the Dauntless initiates get to pass? Surely, in this post-apocalyptic/whatever the hell happened world, you would want to keep population numbers fairly stable, and therefore NOT just randomly let people die? And why have the factionless never rebelled? It’s implied that there’s quite a lot of them, and with Dauntless’s elimination system, you’d assume quite a large percentage of them would be ex-Dauntless. And therefore trained to fight, how to use weapons – and probably willing to go down trying to free themselves.

I still don’t quite know how to rate Divergent. Obviously I have a lot of problems with it; so much of the story just doesn’t make any sense. But I also breezed through the book and quite enjoyed it, despite the gaping plot holes and questions. The last 80 pages or so contain so many shocks and twists, and it’s clear that Veronica Roth is not against making some serious decisions in terms of her characters. It’s better than some YA dystopian fiction that I’ve read, but worse than others – sitting somewhere firmly in the middle.

[pamela]

Please, please tell me that in the three or four days it took me to read Divergent someone invented a time machine so I could go back those three or four days and somehow get them back. Reading this book was one of the biggest wastes of my life.

The argument I hear most with novels like this is that because it's YA I am obviously not the target audience, which is probably why I didn't enjoy it. For me, this does not do today's young adults enough credit. Some of the best novels I've read in the last few years have been YA. E Lockhart's We Were Liars immediately springs to mind. In fact, my favourite book of 2014 was Jonathan Stroud's The Screaming Staircase which is written for age 9-12, an even younger readership! Having a young readership does not mean that people outside their age groups can't enjoy them. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that appealing to a diverse readership is the mark of a great writer. Something that Veronica Roth is not.

Roth's writing style itself is not terrible. She has a good sense of pace, gets her descriptions pretty much down so you know what's going on but don't get bogged down with and excess of descriptive prose. She even has a decent sense of excitement and adventure. I wasn't bored reading Divergent, let's put it that way. Where this book really struggled for me to give it any more than two stars is that the entire basic premise for the entire bloody plot just made no goddamn sense! And I mean that in the sense of it just doesn't work! These so-called 'Divergents' are meant to be super special because they have a normal range of human emotion? Someone in the wake of some form of (I assume?) nuclear catastrophe came up with an idea that meant segregating the entire populace of a city in to dominant personality traits (because apparently that's a thing?) as a means of promoting peace. A committee of people sat around and thought that was reasonable, and then implemented it, and didn't think that segregation and the stifling of a human range of emotions would perhaps have the opposite of the desired effect? If we're living in the past of Divergent's alternate future then we need only see the rise of fundamentalism and the violent outpourings caused by that to see how completely ludicrous an idea that is. The person who had suggested that idea would have been laughed out of the room. And then fired.

Roth writes a world that is too black and white, with everything pigeonholed to perfection. I see that essentially that's the point she's trying to make, but all I see when I read Tris' character is not a girl who is 'Divergent', but an ordinary teenager trying to find her place in the world. Divergent's aren't special or abnormal, they're just normal fucking people. There is no deeper knowledge to be gained here, because the world created is so unbelievably unrealistic; a pastiche of sci-fi and fantasy tropes used to represent the human condition, but represented in the blandest possible packaging.

[Joséphine]

Ratings:
August 3, 2013 — 5 stars
April 30, 2015 — 4 stars

Thoughts upon rereading: The first time round I read Divergent in 2013, I devoured it. I loved it to bits. For most of my teen years I read contemporary fiction and to finally delve more into science fiction, specifically dystopian fiction, was exhilarating. Since then I've read more dystopian books, some of which impressed me more and some less. Also, this time round I tabbed the pages with post-it notes, annotated and cross-referenced. This close reading forced me to be more critical (in the analytical sense) as I read.

I was amazed how some moments in the beginning chapters were shadows of what was to come. I saw this as a strength of the overarching narrative. I found two inconsistencies but compared to the many subtle moments that were linked, I figured they didn't matter that much. The characters were well-developed and distinctive, even though each faction's members were supposed to be more similar than different.

What made me a little sad was that I felt much more disconnected from Tris as the first-person narrator as opposed to when I read Divergent the very first time and absolutely adored Tris. Either way, she's a great protagonist who shows strength, weakness, dominance, submission, and basically the complexity you'd expect from someone whose story you're reading.

I was hesitant to start this series, because I read a spoiler which told me how Allegiant, the last book in the series, ended.Tris, the main character dies. I would see this series in every bookshop and I was afraid to buy it because I felt as though I might not enjoy the series due to the ending that I knew about. After I watched the movie (yes, I broke the book nerd rules by watched the movie before reading the book), I wanted to see what the hype was all about and thankfully at the time, my school library had the book. There was a humongous waiting list, and even although I put my name on the list in June last year. When I finally got the book in my hand, saying that I was excited was a total UNDERSTATEMENT.

Beatrice Prior, the main character, lives in a society that maintains peace by separating its 16 year old citizens into a faction based on the virtues that they have. There are five factions: Abnegation (selflessness), Amity (peace), Candor (honesty), Dauntless (bravery) and Erudite (knowledge). When an aptitude test is taken, Beatrice's result are inconclusive and she decides to leave Abnegation and join Dauntless.

Beatrice (Tris) was an amazing and REAL main character. She's likable, smart and her thoughts and emotions are easy to understand. I loved the manner at which she developed throughout Divergent, physically and emotionally. At the beginning, she isn't good at everything (unlike most characters, who fight a battle for the first time, don't even know a basic self-defence mechanism and wins), but she gradually and slowly learns how to be the best that she can be.

The secondary characters were well developed. I loved hating the villains and rooting for the heroes. Tris's relationship with her mother and family was beautiful. Christina was such a fun best friend and Four was dreamy. I loved the chemistry that he had with Tris and it was amazing to see the way in which their attraction progressed into a relationship that I was rooting for.

Divergent has a whole load of Dystopian aspects to it, but Roth was able to make the cliche' parts seem original. The whole logic that this book is build on, was simple, but effective. Veronica Roth has an amazing imagination that she used to form Tris's tests and trails and her fight scenes were realistic and easy to visualize.

I'm really glad that I gave this book a chance and I can't wait to get my hands on Insurgent to find out where Tris's journey takes her. If there was one word that I could use to describe to describe this dystopian novel, it would be REAL.