empressbrooke
Written on Aug 1, 2007
Usually I love books about revenge. Some of my favorites - The Count of Monte Cristo, The Prestige - are well-crafted, compelling vengeance tales. The Meaning of Night, however, misses the mark in a few respects. To begin with, it's about 200 pages too long. By the time I hit page 500, I started to feel annoyed that Edward was still whining about all the terrible things that happened to him. I wanted some action, some movement forward, something.
Secondly, Edward royally screws everything up by "falling in love" with a woman, and as is often the case in Victorian-era stories, he falls in love with her simply by looking at her. They haven't even spoken two words to each other before he announces to the reader that he is now forever her captive. Edmond Dantès certainly never let such stupidity get in the way of his vengeance.
However, Edward Glyver isn't Edmond Dantès, and that does make The Meaning of Night an interesting read. Edward is far from a trustworthy narrator. He's arrogant, short-sighted, and is so fixated on his nemesis that the reader starts to wonder, is Phoebus Daunt really responsible for everything Edward says he is? Or is Edward simply mentally unstable and paranoid?
Overall, I enjoyed this novel and its lush Victorian setting, although it would have benefited from a shorter length and less stupidity on the narrator's part.