Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead (Acting Edition S.) (An Evergreen book)

by Tom Stoppard

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead is a play which, as it were, takes place in the wings of Hamlet, and finds both humour and poignancy in the situation of the ill-fated attendant lords.

The National Theatre production in April 1967 made Tom Stoppard's reputation virtually overnight. Its wit, stagecraft and verbal verve remain as exhilarating as they were then and the play has become a contemporary classic.

• ISBN10: 0571081827
• ISBN13: 9780571081820
• Publish Date: 1 January 1973 (first published May 1967)
• Publish Status: Active
• Out of Print: 26 January 2021
• Publish Country: GB
• Imprint: Faber & Faber
• Edition: Main
• Format: Paperback (B-Format (198x129 mm))
• Pages: 128
• Language: English

Reviews

[Amber (The Literary Phoenix)]

It’s been a really long time – almost a decade – since I’ve tried to decipher the hidden meanings behind a play. But I’m going to try! I’m pretty sure that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead is about … death. I suppose that shouldn’t be a revelation, since it’s in the title, but man I struggled with this one?

Honestly, this play just made me feel stupid. I feel like there must have been some exciting and deep conversation to be had about this play. Maybe it’s the sort of thing that’s a bit lost in translation? Maybe it’s better with group discussion and guidance? I know plays come across better when they have been seen and not read, but I actually had more trouble figuring out (what I thought) the point of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead was than any other play that comes to mind. But, like I said, it’s be a while?

Also, I don’t suppose it helped this used copy had copies notes on the backside of the front cover about modernism in theatre and the world of the play.

Okay, outside of the confusion about the characters (who were constantly trying to remember who was who and what was happening) I enjoyed the concept of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. I think it’s so cool that Stoppard took two minor characters out of Hamlet in order to explore the story more. It’s almost like fan fiction – as a reader, I know there’s been many times where I wanted to know more about a minor character, or else the story abandoned a storyline I really enjoyed and I wish I had gotten to learn more. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead is great for that. Especially if you’re a fan of Hamlet! It’s always cool to get more.

A lot of this play focused on philosophical conversation. There was talk about the meaning of death, the way other characters mourned, and the knowledge of mortality. The speeches were interesting to me. The idle, repetitive conversation was not. Again, this is something I think would probably come across better in the stage performance as opposed to just reading the lines.

I can see where this could be a good play, and I can see where it would be amusing in person. I don’t think this is the best one to translate to simply reading the play however. If you like Shakespeare, meaningful dialogue, and a smidge of comedy, I do recommend taking in a performance!

Just, eh. I know a lot of people love it but I don't see what's to great about it. Maybe I read it too quickly or didn't dig deep enough but this book just didn't really do it for me. It's short enough that I didn't feel like I wasted my time reading it though. I did however recently see a short bit of the film adaption in which R&G are flipping a coin and enjoyed it quite thoroughly (the class that day was on randomization and probability) so perhaps I should revisit it now that I'm a bit older.