Reversed Gaze

by Mwenda Ntarangwi and Salwa Castelo-Branco

Deftly illustrating how life circumstances can influence ethnographic fieldwork, Mwenda Ntarangwi focuses on his experiences as a Kenyan anthropology student and professional anthropologist practicing in the United States and Africa. Whereas Western anthropologists often study non-Western cultures, Mwenda Ntarangwi reverses these common roles and studies the Western culture of anthropology from an outsider's viewpoint while considering larger debates about race, class, power, and the representation of the "other." Tracing his own immersion into American anthropology, Ntarangwi identifies textbooks, ethnographies, coursework, professional meetings, and feedback from colleagues and mentors that were key to his development. Reversed Gaze enters into a growing anthropological conversation on representation and self-reflexivity that ethnographers have come to regard as standard anthropological practice, opening up new dialogues in the field by allowing anthropologists to see the role played by subjective positions in shaping knowledge production and consumption. Recognizing the cultural and racial biases that shape anthropological study, this book reveals the potential for diverse participation and more democratic decision making in the identity and process of the profession.

• ISBN10: 1282941615
• ISBN13: 9781282941618
• Publish Date: 1 January 2010
• Publish Status: Active
• Out of Print: 17 February 2015
• Publish Country: US
• Imprint: University of Illinois Press
• Format: eBook
• Language: English

Reviews

[clementine]

Ntarangwi compassionately critiques Western anthropological culture and practices from a place of genuine love of the field. This book is incredibly (and consciously) readable for an academic text and in my opinion should be read by all cultural anthropology students. Ntarangwi exposes the problems with contemporary Western anthropology - racial, semantic, academic, and so forth - without ever losing sight of the fact that he loves the discipline. My main critique is that he does engage in the practice of recycling old field notes that he himself criticizes in the text; I also felt that at times his ethnographic writing was so detailed as to move me away from the central - and critically important - point he was making. Overall, though, this is a well thought-out, well-written, and much-needed ethnographic text that deserves to be widely-read and discussed.